Archive for June, 2009

San Francisco Filipino Community Rally on Tuesday at City Hall to save non-profits endangered by funding cuts

San Francisco’s estimated American Filipino population of nearly 50,000 (about 7 percent of the city), still gets no respect.

A new recommendation for spending $9 million of city funds for disadvantaged families has just been released.

And guess what? No Filipino non-profits that directly serve the community are included.

There’s hundreds of thousands of dollars for YMCA programs throughout the city (nearly $700,000 to the Hunters Point/BayView Y alone). There’s $650,000 for the Instituto Familiar de la Raza in the Mission. Another $500,000 for the APA Family Support Services in Chinatown. The money trickles down to other neighborhoods and groups throughout the city. But there’s not one Filipino anything in the mix.

$9 million in funds and not a penny for American Filipinos. Are our families in San Francisco doing so well?

Not according to Rudy Asercion, executive director of the West Bay Pilipino Multi-Service Center in San Francisco. He knows what’s happening on the streets of the city. In the last year, he says his non-profit has helped numerous families hit so hard by the recession they are literally in the dark.

“When families get evicted or the electricity is cut off, they come to West Bay for help,” said Asercion. “In last 6 months alone, we’ve had families who’ve gone six or seven days without electricity. Then they come to us and the lights turn on.”

It’s not easy to let there be light. West Bay runs on a tight budget of around $200,000, mostly from small grants both corporate and private. The after-school program alone costs about $60,000 to run. But it all helps to provide a lot for Filipino families in need.

Asercion talks about success stories like Sarah Ramos, a 4.0 student from Everett (my alma mater). Sarah’s family was homeless until they came to West Bay. The organization was able to get Sarah and her family housing and food stamps. The kids were immediately placed in the after school program. In addition, West Bay helped Sarah, who has a medical issue, get treatment immediately. In the fall, she begins her first year at the city’s prestigious Lowell High School (also my alma mater).

But for every Sarah, there are others who find themselves on a different track in the South of Market. Because of immigration policies, wives and children often come first to America, leaving the husband behind. When families are apart, too often they break up.

“The husband gets a girl friend, then the wife gets a boyfriend, and the young children get confused,” said Asercion. He sees it affect the children at his after school program as it thrusts them into a predictable death spiral.

So now it’s ad all around with parents without jobs, kids without purpose, and now service organizations without funds to help these people cope.

That’s why the $9 million in city funds was considered a critical source of funding for organizations like West Bay. It was the lead applicant in a package which included smaller non-profits that serve the Filipino community (The Filipino Senior Resource Center by Mint Mall, the Family Resource Center, South of Market Employment Center and the South of Market Clinic). West Bay, being the longest standing organization of the group, took the lead. It asked for $317,000, a fairly modest amount.

But when the final recommendations were made West Bay was snubbed. No other Filipino based organizations were listed.

Asercion said without an infusion of these funds, existing programs at West Bay will be threatened.

“This will shut off a big percentage of West Bay’s operation,” Asercion said. “We’ll be constrained to our after-school program.”

But that’s a small part of what West Bay does. Failure to secure funding from the city means that those who work on other outreach projects, like social workers, including tutors and counselors, may soon join the ranks of the people they help—the struggling American Filipino families of San Francisco.

It’s hard to imagine why politicians can so easily ignore the needs of the community.Asercion says he has had an inquiry from Board of Supervisors President David Chiu about the situation. But Asercion says it’s really Mayor Gavin Newsom’s call. The panel that made the recommendations, and the committee that will approve it all, are all made up of Newsom devotees.

A final hearing before the Children and Families (First 5 San Francisco) Commission, is  set for this week.

That means there’s still time to rally.

If you can’t make the rally, Asercion says call Mayor Gavin Newsom’s office at 415-554.6141.

Urge Newsom to make sure American Filipino families in need are not ignored.

Solidarity Rally
City Hall

1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place
San Francisco, California 94102
Tuesday, June 30, 2009 at 5PM

No Comments

Bernie Madoff gets 150 years…

Is that with simple or compound interest?

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/30/business/30madoff.html?_r=1&hp

No Comments

Michael Jackson: Never can say goodbye

If Michael Jackson were to speak from the grave, he probably would have one reaction to all the obloviating going on from all corners about his sudden death: “Shut up and play the music.”

Listen to it. Dance to it. Michael isn’t gone. His legacy is there. The spirit is in the grooves, or in this digital age in the unique 1/0 patterns that merged rhythm and blues, pop and rock.

For the last 40 years, Jackson was the eccentric Pied Piper. While some continued to follow him, many got turned off by the sideshow.

But death is redemptive. Now people are remembering what it was that first compelled them to watch, listen, and pay attention.

He was a pop artist and entertainer like no other. Michael once told a reporter that the worse thing you can do when trying to dance is to think. Thinking kills. It’s the music. Listen to the music.

In the last 40 years, Jackson’s music changed American society, broke race barriers, brought people together.

Now it’s the soundtrack of the global mourning for the King of Pop.

No Comments

Gov.Mark Sanford’s Latino Strategy?

At least, the governor of South Carolina didn’t say he was trying to build his Latino base.

But really, what is the big deal about Mark Sanford having sex? Don’t we know that politicians will have sex, wherever they can get it. And don’t we know that the good politicians can survive even the most sordid affairs. (Hello, Mr. Bill…)

What gets me is how Sanford just disappeared. I’m sure he could have found a Motel 6 down there around North Myrtle Beach.

So basically South Carolina must dump their governor not for the affair, but for botching the affair.

For a politician, indiscretion is a mortal sin.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/26/us/26sanford.html?_r=1&hp

No Comments

A Father’s Day Salute

Sunday is Father’s Day, which in my mind really honors anyone who plays that role despite gender–or sexual preference—or even if you’re not the father. Are you there? Do you play catch when you’d rather be sleeping? Tag, your it. Happy Father’s Day to you!

I’m pretty traditional when it comes to fatherhood, except for when I celebrate it.

For me it’s always June 14th which this year arrived a week before the “official” Father’s Day. It’s the day I recall my  most memorable day with my dad.

We went to see the Giants play baseball.

My dad loved baseball. He was also from the Philippines, from Ilocos.  “Like Marcos” he was proud to say, when people were still proud to have some connection with the dictator. My dad spoke with an Ilocano accent which I know so well, I can turn on and off like Jim Nabors doing Gomer Pyle.  My dad sounded just like Marcos, but without the power. He spoke English too. But I spoke it better. It made our relationship a quiet one. The only time we really connected was when watching baseball.

My dad was many innings older than me—50 years worth. I remember when he taught me how to play ball. We’d go to Golden Gate Park’s Panhandle—an appropriate name for a fry cook and his son to play catch.

He wasn’t great. But when he couldn’t make a basket catch like Willie Mays, he’d take us to Candlestick and see No.24.

Baseball always gave us a context. “What’s the score?” one of us would always ask. One of us would always know. We followed the score. But of course, there were seasons when not even baseball could save us. Before I was out of middle school, my father had retired, and I was going to father-son events alone. He was old. By the time I was twelve-years-old, I was an ageist.

We kept drifting apart, our lives patterned as a baseball diamond. He was the first base line, I was the third base line, a field apart connected only at home.

But then I went to college on the East Coast. Though I majored in alienation, I took a few courses where I learned a little about the hardship and racism endured by Filipino immigrants in the 1920s. I learned about the anti-miscegenation laws.

I never understood why my father, after coming to America in1927, lived a bachelor’s life until the 1950’s. I thought it was by choice, or lack of social skills. I never saw it as a function of the kind of wastefulness that comes out racism. History taught me that, and through it, I found a clear path to my father. Perhaps a little late, but it set up our ninth inning perfectly.

On the Wednesday before Father’s Day 1978, we did a day game, my treat. We were a striking pair. I was wearing a jacket and tie so we could get a businessman’s discount. He was in a Giants cap and running shoes, and acting like a rascal—cutting in line, running about, me in tow. Seats cost a buck-fifty to sit in left field back then. But the little guy wanted to sit closer. So we sneaked down past the guard and wound up in prime third-base territory.

During the game, we enjoyed our passion quietly. Fancying myself a broadcaster, I did play-by –play in my head. Every now and then, I would turn to Dad for a little color. He was involved with the drama himself, in between bites of his homemade adobo sandwich—vinegary pork bits on white bread, tastier than a ball park frank.

The Giants celebrated our outing with a fine performance. They fought back to take the lead from the Phillies. And then it was up to Vida Blue to mow them down in the bottom of the night. Blue, no longer in his prime and written off as an old man in his 30s, stuck out both Greg Luzinski and Mike Schmidt, the heart of the order, to end the game.

We stood and cheered together in wild appreciation, which led to our only real conversation of the day. Would the Giants get through June and go all the way? My dad was willing to take a psychic flyer on that one. “They will  go all the way now,” he said.

As it was, the Giants didn’t. But my dad did. Two hours later, back home, after he was the future and the highlights on the local news, my father died on that Wednesday before Father’s Day.

Hardening of the arteries, the doctor said. But deep in my heart, I knew it was Pennant Fever.

The origins of this essay date back to 1989 when I was at NPR. Not National Philippines Radio, National Public Radio in Washington. Every year I reprise some of it as my Father’s Day salute. This year, I shared the story with my young son for the first time as we sat in left field at AT&T Park.

The Giants won. And everyone was safe at home.

No Comments

Iran out of balance: how the vote and the ensuing protests play out

The protests of what looks to be a rigged election in Iran harken back to the ’80s and the Chinese Pro-Democracy movement on the Mainland, and the People Power of the Philippines.  The outrage is heartening for fans of democracy in action.  Even in Iran’s religious culture, people reach a threshold, and then they take to the streets. An ayatollah’s repression is one thing, but the perception of a stolen election? No one wants a dictator in the 21st century.

Iran is out of balance. What happens next?

The crowds can pressure change, but only to a point. The Philippines overthrow of Marcos remains the gold standard of people power, giving hope that change can happen. But in the Philippines, the dictator was merely replaced by less ego-driven oligarchs. In the absence of real leadership, the country still struggles.

China, didn’t rid itself of the CP, but it did loosen up and evolve into a capitalistic hybrid. Look at how the 20th anniversary of Tienenman was remembered there and here.  Enriching the people and instilling in them a healthy economic self-interest has calmed down the fire for absolute democracy. It’s enabled China to find a balance that stifles protest and perpetuates the CP’s vision.

The crowds in Iran will produce a result in-between the Philippines and China. Iran’s religious leaders still hold the upper hand, but they remain beholden to  the current dictator, I mean president.  So it’s unlikely we will see change that makes a difference. We may see significant bloodshed before it’s calm again.

In the end, the answer for those who thirst democracy will be the same as for freedom loving Filipinos and Chinese.

They come to America.

They may continue their protests here. Or they may  just live their lives in quiet liberty.

But the destination doesn’t change.

The lucky are here, homesick, but free.

No Comments

Why are champion race horses slaughtered for food? Watch this PETA investigation

http://www.petatv.com/tvpopup/video.asp?video=japan_horses_peta_long&Player=wm

When a stud is a dud,  champions end up as dinner in Asia.

No Comments

Laura Ling and Euna Lee, the new face of U.S./North Korean Impasse

Forget about Kim Jong Il’s bad hair days, and images of the dictator as an Asian Dr. Strangelove.

Today, my heart goes out to fellow Asian American journalists Laura Ling and Euna Lee.

They are now the human face of  the North Korea/U.S. impasse.

The U.S. and North Korea have no diplomatic relations. Apparently, someone in Pyongyang thinks Ling and Lee may help force the issue.

North Korea has sentenced the two women to 12 years of hard labor, according to KCNA, the North’s official news agency.

The two were arrested in March while doing stories for Current TV about North Korean families desperate migration for food along the Chinese border.

Yesterday, in a closed session, the Central Court, the highest in North Korea, convicted the journalists for “committing hostilities against the Korean nation and illegal entry.”

Their exact crime is irrelevant. Ling and Lee were simply too good and too convenient for the North Koreans to pass up. They’re now in place as the perfect tools to help solve the non-diplomatic “diplomacy that exists between the U.S. and North Korea.

Everything in this story is tea-leaf reading, with Ling and Lee up to their eyeballs in the muck.

It’s all rather surreal, where things aren’t always what they appear.

The State Department and Hillary Clinton have issued public statements condemning the convictions and say all that can be done is being done. Whatever that means.

Meanwhile, North Korea has been banging a loud drum, firing off nuclear tests in the past two months. The country wants to be accepted as a nuclear power and doesn’t mind alienating friends and foes alike. The U.S. response to the testing has been predictable. Beyond a perfunctory public condemnation, the world has been waiting to see a more forceful response from the U.S. to punish North Korea.

Pyongyang complicates matters by dangling Ling and Lee.

Pyongyang has put bait on the hook. Does the U.S. send an envoy? Does it lead to at least the beginning of the end of the long diplomatic impasse?

These issues take time, unfortunately. But the harsh sentence to Ling and Lee indicate the North Koreans mean business.

, , ,

No Comments

Obama’s affirmative action for Muslims, Harvard Class Day, my day

Barack Obama couldn’t be Harvard Class Day speaker yesterday for obvious reasons. He was too busy preparing to reach out to his Muslim brothers and sisters.

Outreach to Muslims? This is affirmative action the U.S. can really use.

Policy-wise, Obama’s address  could have been a speech George W. Bush would have given. The end goal of Obama’s comments essentially is a two-state solution exactly what Bush was pushing in the end.

But what a difference the messenger makes.

Would you say that Bush had a credibility problem? He only helped perpetuate the white stereotype that Obama referred to in his speech. Of course, it’s no different from the way Bin Laden feeds the Muslim stereotypes Americans know and love.

They all get in the way of communication.

But with a new messenger before them, the Muslim audience saw a new global leader in whom they could see a bit of a  reflection of themselves. It was worth another look at the New America.

“I’ve come here to Cairo to seek a new beginning between the United States and Muslims around the world,” said Obama. “One based on mutual interest and mutual respect.”

With Obama’s background in Indonesia, his parentage, his cultural connection comes a new kind of diplomatic tone that may prove to be a more productive path to a lasting peace.

It’s a personal touch, the kind that comes with a new messenger. Denigrate Obama’s Muslim outreach  as just a pretty speech. We are in a phase, amid war and terror, where one cannot make light of pretty speech.

Obama was plenty tough on both Israel and Hamas.  Masked in pretty speech, it may help all sides see and value their common interests.

CLASS DAY

So Obama was at a university in Cairo and not Cambridge. Not at Harvard. But Matt Lauer was.

On the “The Today” show, Lauer  talked about being the Harvard Class Day speaker: “Giving a speech to Harvard students and their parents and the faculty is just nerve-wracking and I admit it was intimidating.”

I can relate. I gave the student speech before the Class Day speaker in 1977 (George Plimpton that year). And it was intimidating. And exhilarating. It was a funny speech making fun of Harvard. So, of course, it got laughs. And one big one, I’ll never forget.

As I look back, I have given many speeches, but because of the setting the students, the parents, and  the faculty that Lauer talked about, it was special.

I look to replicate that feeling every time I step to a podium.

, , , , ,

No Comments

Context? Here’s what Sotomayor said in 2001; Was it racist?

Sometimes you need more than the soundbite. In the new racist war being waged by conservatives over the nomination of Sonia Sotomayor to the Supreme Court, it seems that there’s an attempt  to stymie the new emerging  politics of diversity with the polarizing old politics of angry white men.

It’s so 1994.

Going back to the hate politics of a previous decade doesn’t get us anywhere we need to be.

So I admit to being a little puzzled by how conservatives like Rush Limbaugh continue to call Sotomayor a racist for comments made in Berkeley in 2001.

The phrase that conservatives are in a tizzy about is bolded below.But you tell me if there’s an ounce of racism when you see how the phrase came up in her talk in Berkeley in 2001.

Justice O’Connor has often been cited as saying that a wise old man and wise old woman will reach the same conclusion in deciding cases. I am not so sure Justice O’Connor is the author of that line since Professor Resnik attributes that line to Supreme Court Justice Coyle. I am also not so sure that I agree with the statement. First, as Professor Martha Minnow has noted, there can never be a universal definition of wise. Second, I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life.

“Let us not forget that wise men like Oliver Wendell Holmes and Justice Cardozo voted on cases which upheld both sex and race discrimination in our society. Until 1972, no Supreme Court case ever upheld the claim of a woman in a gender discrimination case. I, like Professor Carter, believe that we should not be so myopic as to believe that others of different experiences or backgrounds are incapable of understanding the values and needs of people from a different group. Many are so capable. As Judge Cedarbaum pointed out to me, nine white men on the Supreme Court in the past have done so on many occasions and on many issues including Brown.

“However, to understand takes time and effort, something that not all people are willing to give. For others, their experiences limit their ability to understand the experiences of others. Other simply do not care. Hence, one must accept the proposition that a difference there will be by the presence of women and people of color on the bench. Personal experiences affect the facts that judges choose to see. My hope is that I will take the good from my experiences and extrapolate them further into areas with which I am unfamiliar. I simply do not know exactly what that difference will be in my judging. But I accept there will be some based on my gender and my Latina heritage.

These judges aren’t robots. They’re human.  They have feelings and experiences that will inform their decisions. That’s why a diverse America needs a diverse high court,one that creates a certain empathy for all those seeking justice.  Empathy alone won’t return  a favorable decision.  But it will assure anyone who stands before the court that no perspectives were overlooked. That’s what a diverse bench promises, a sense of fairness and justice for all.

, ,

No Comments

Rss Feed Tweeter button Facebook button Technorati button Reddit button Myspace button Linkedin button Webonews button Delicious button Digg button Flickr button Stumbleupon button Newsvine button Youtube button