Posts Tagged Mitt Romney
Asian Americans were part of Obama Coalition in big numbers, but with some intra-ethnic differences, AALDEF exit poll shows
Last night you heard media citing exit polls about African Americans backing Barack Obama by 93 percent. Latinos were at 71 percent.
And Asian Americans?
Not a mention.
Yet, the group was a big part of the Obama victory.
72 percent of Asian Americans backed the president, according to the Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund-backed Election Eve poll. The phone survey sampled 800 Asian American voters in 50 states the weekend before the election. With early voting, nearly half of all poll respondents had already voted.
Asian Indians with 83 percent gave the strongest support for Obama, based on the survey’s intra-ethnic data. Vietnamese and Filipinos were the least supportive with 59 and 60 percent respectively for Obama. Consequently, those two groups lead the Asian support for Romney.
The national poll put Romney’s Asian American support at 26 percent, with both Vietnamese and Filipinos groups at 40 percent for the Republican challenger.
But when the question comes to political identity, 41 percent of Asian Americans still dentify as Democrats, with the intra-ethnic numbers showing Filipinos and Japanese, at 50 and 51percent, respectively.
Only 14 percent of Asian Americans overall identify as Republican, with Korean, Filipino and Vietnamese more so at 23 percent.
What makes Asian Americans interesting in the future for politicos is that 45 percent called themselves Independent (29 percent), Other (3 percent), or “Don’t Know” (13 percent).
Asian Americans are a group with an evolving political identity. As I’ve said, they’re up for grabs. Going forward, no one should take Asian Americans for granted.
And yet, when asked if anyone from “a campaign, political party, or community organization asked you to vote or register to vote, more than half of all respondents nationally (51 percent) said no. 64 percent of Indians felt most neglected.
It’s clear, we all should be outraged by the lack of outreach.
Someone missed the boat last night. And it wasn’t just Romney with his “All-White” strategy.
That’s why polls like this one from AALDEF are extremely important. It let’s people know when it comes to participatory politics, Asian Americans are quickly filling the void.
President Barack Obama seemed to finally figure out what to do in a debate—to assert and negate, in essence to clash and cross swords with Governor Mitt Romney on any issue on the table.
As a result, the second debate was far from the steamroller for Romney as in the first debate.
I expected the town hall format to be a tad more folksy and interactive. But the crowd of undecided voters assembled at Hofstra University were just props in the middle of a real fight between Obama and Romney. Both came out ready, asserting and countering even outside the rigid debate format. It created a challenge for the moderator Candy Crowley, who did an admirable job keeping decorum and keeping the debaters on point, at one time correcting Romney on Obama’s response on Libya, the feistiest moment of the debate.
But to me, while Romney seemed to be level with his last performance, the president’s more energized approach left the lasting overall impression that his performance on this night was greater than Romney’s—maybe even enough to erase the memory of the president’s first debate lapse. Perhaps for his base. As for undecideds, that’s not so clear.
From the very first question, the style and substance of both was apparent. To the Adelphi student who asked if he would have a job on graduation, Romney had the empathy, but no real plan. Obama came out with an answer that was like a microscosm of the whole debate, including the goal of creaing high-paying manufacturing jobs, a jab in about Romney’s Detroit stand, tax code revisions, business incentives, energy plans.
In the same two-minute answer, Obama scored his highest response from CNN focus group members with this line:
“We got to make sure we have the best education system in the world, and the fact that you’re going to college is great. But I want everybody to have a great education and we’ve worked hard that student loans are available for folks like you.”
The only negatives for me in the debate came when the combatants crossed the line, turning the civility of parry and riposte into a street brawl. I kept wondering if any of this was scoring with the demographic of choice in this campaign, women.
There were times Obama was clearly getting under Romney’s skin. One point Romney turned to engage Obama on an issue, but instead of taking the bait, the president merely looked at Romney and said in a dismissive tone, “Go on.”
That’s the way to use your status.
Other issues: Romney tried to attack Obama on immigration. But Romney had no response when Obama pointed out that Romney’s key immigration advisor is the author of Arizona’s “Show me your papers” law.
Still, I didn’t see any real knockout blow in this debate. Overall, I’d say Obama won on points in O/R II.
But because Obama played rope-a-dope in O/R I , the race is still closer than it should be.
To all you Mittwagoners: Romney was good on camera in the first presidential debate, but what about the hidden camera truth?
I’d love to have a hidden camera on Romney this morning to see how he’s reacting to his performance last night.
Do you think he’s high-fiving Ann?
Last night was showbiz for Romney. Make no mistake it was a performance, and he was on his game. But was it the truth, the real Romney?
Re-watching parts of the debate this morning, it’s amazing how Obama didn’t seem to have a sense of what game he was playing, as if he were waiting for Romney to be deferential. Debates are about clash, contrasts, and Obama didn’t engage sharply enough. He acted like it was a photo op and not a debate.
Debates are also evanescent, real time events. You’VE got to call your opponent on the spot and press. You can’t rely on fact-checking later to get back. It’s all face value, because the bond with viewer/voters is made emotionally on the impression you give off. So as a debater, you’re either there or you’re not. And Obama wasn’t there. Romney was.
I had mentioned that affirmative action could have been an issue that would speak to Asian Americans. And there were chances to sneak in a line or two about that in the “role of government” section. But there was very little time for that, or for other key domestic issues like abortion, women’s rights, immigrant rights. Obama could have mentioned the 47 percent to sharply contrast where Romney stands on the role of government. Instead, Romney was able to sound like he’s a compassionate supporter of the middle income voter. Laughable, but that’s what happens when the moderator loses control of the debate and allows the debaters to go at it. In a tightly scripted format where moderators contribution is to say “Time!” a looser conversation can seem good. But this one got a little out of hand, as Romney took control.
If you saw Romney debate and liked him, just make sure you replay in your head that 47 percent tape. Remember that’s the real Romney. That’s what Romney really thinks. Romney isn’t the prefab Romney. The Romney in the 47 percent tape didn’t show up last night, because the cameras weren’t hidden.
That’s why you can’t trust any favorable impression he may have given last night. We didn’t get the hidden camera truth. When the stakes are this high, it’s the only thing you can trust.
Tale of two tapes: Secret video speaks the truth about Romney as candidate goes ethnic and talks of how it would be “helpful to be Latino.”
Maybe Mitt Romney was scared that the campaign had gone all foreign policy-oriented because of that anti-Arab internet video that he secretly was yearning for some other video to change the dynamics of the campaign.
But the video he had in mind was something like the polished one he did that aired this morning on ”Live with Kelly and Michael.”
At one point on this tape, Romney responded to a question about his ability, or lack thereof, of being empathetic with the American people.
On tape, Romney is like his hair. Perfect. He brings up being pastor of his church. And then he mentions his wife’s MS, implying how it shows his compassion. Ann talked earlier about Mitt’s “good heart.”
That’s the Romney message.
Instead Romney has to deal with that “other tape,” the “47 percent” tape secretly recorded at a $50,000 a plate fundraiser in Boca Raton. It’s got the political class buzzing. And you should be buzzing about it too.
It shows the real Romney as he dishes the high rollers some GOP red-meat.
Said Romney on THAT tape:
“There are 47 percent of the people who will vote for the president no matter what. All right, there are 47 percent who are with him, who are dependent upon government, who believe that they are victims, who believe the government has a responsibility to care for them, who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you-name-it. That that’s an entitlement. And the government should give it to them. And they will vote for this president no matter what…These are people who pay no income tax.”
Did he just throw more than half the American public under the food truck?
Later in California yesterday after Romney’s 47 percent comments were leaked, Romney appeared with hairs out-of-place, at a media opportunity where he tried to explain the remarks away saying he was just ”speaking off the cuff.”
Sort of like Clint Eastwood at the RNC?
Romney didn’t apologize but clarified that he was showing the difference between those who want a “government centered society” vs. the one he wants –”a free enterprise, free individual society, where people pursuing their dreams are able to employ one another, build enterprises, build the strongest economy in the world.”
The tape really is Romney.
Romney is the guy who says no to you at the bank.
He’s the guy who gets his by living off others’ misery.
He’s the guy who makes conservatives yearn for a Bush. Any Bush. For cover.
What should be abundantly clear by now is that Romney’s perfect for a private corporation.
Just not for a United States that’s struggling to get back on its feet.
This is the man who wants to be the nation’s top public servant?
At one point in the secret tape, he attempts to show humor as he mentions his father being born to American parents in Mexico:
“Had he been born of Mexican parents I’d have a better chance of winning this, but he was not,” Romney said.
Too bad. Then Democrats could be birthers too.
Romney finished off wistfully, saying “It would be helful to be Latino.”
Maybe. But then as the polls show, he would probably be voting for Obama.