Why are we having a torturous debate on torture?

Does it really matter what Speaker Pelosi knew and when she knew what she knew on torture?

I would be surprised if the CIA told Pelosi the absolute truth on waterboarding back in 2002.  And even if it did reveal everything to Pelosi back then, it seems absurd to equate whatever that would be (hypocrisy? Imagine that?) with the true moral crime of the U.S. employing torture as standard operating procedure.

Bush and the Republicans were in control. They were the ones  in charge of Waterboard Central. They can pull in the Dems somewhat into the current blame game, but only as fringe players.  It’s true the Democrats in general didn’t speak up as loudly and clearly as they could have. But that’s politics.  As is all the finger pointing now.

The problem is the U.S. has never spoken out as forcefully as it should have against torture. Tough to do when the country is the perpetrator on two major war fronts. Hard to really say no on torture without looking  soft on terrorism. It explains all the pussy-footing around the ethics of torture.

As a Bay Area guy, I’m apt to believe Pelosi. But all her claims about CIA lying only show how mealy mouth everyone in America , from politicians to the general  public,have been.

While  suspects were tortured for real, prime-time TV shows like “24” glorified  torture as entertainment.  If you cheered Jack Bauer, did you cheer George Bush?

Or did you change the channel?

Im afraid the voices of outrage from on  high and low, were all  for the most part, shamefully muted.

The country was whipped into a xenophobic mindset where giving the bad guys an extra dose of torture– for good measure—may have at the time  seemed reasonable.

In retrospect, what were our leaders thinking?

Asian Pacific American Heritage Month is half over; Have you hugged an Asian Pacific American yet? How about an LGBT APA?

Specifically, have you shown a little love for Dan Choi or Sandy Tsao?

Both are doing what few Asian Americans ever do: Stand up to the institutional hypocrisy in America.

Lt. Dan Choi and 2nd Lt. Sandy Tsao could make history, if they are the first to break the military’s “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” charade.

The policy makes sexual orientation irrelevant in the military, until it’s spoken. A mere verbal admission of one’s homosexuality is considered a sexual act and grounds for dismissal.

Choi, 28, is a West Point grad, trained in Arabic and until recently a valued member of the New York National Guard. But when he admitted being gay on a national cable show, the Army has now moved for his discharge.

His service was never in question. But his homosexuality is. In fact, in reports  Choi admits to being a bad homosexual claiming zero  sexual relations with men or women, for that matter, while in the Army. It was only when he recently fell in love with another man that he decided that coming out was the morally right thing to do.

Because President Obama has strongly opposed DADT in public, Choi is hoping the president will take up his cause. It takes both bodies of Congress and the president to change the policy, which seems unlikely. But Choi is hoping people see through the hypocrisy and join his petition drive:

http://www.couragecampaign.org/page/s/dontfiredan

Choi actually is the second Asian American in recent weeks to come forward.

2nd Lt. Sandy Tsao, an army officer in St. Louis, disclosed  her homosexuality and actually wrote to President Obama.  The president wrote her back.

“It is because of outstanding Americans like you that I committed to changing our current policy,” Obama’ wrote. “Although it will take some time to complete (partly because it needs congressional action) I intend to fulfill my commitment!”

It could be an empty promise for Tsao, discharged officially May 19.

Roxana Saberi: Accidental tourist, accidental spy?

In the first news reports from Tehran, freelancer Roxana Saberi says the key point in her prosecution by Iran  was a confidential document she copied “out of curiosity” two years ago while working as a translator.

She didn’t do anything with the document. Didn’t pass it on to American authorities as Iranian officials alleged.

Perhaps she just wanted a souvenir.

I’m very happy for her family and for her that she’s safe.

But in her first interview after her ordeal, Saberi establishes herself as both accidental tourist, and accidental spy.

She’s still also one lucky accidental journalist. Continue reading Roxana Saberi: Accidental tourist, accidental spy?

Emil Guillermo's amok commentary on race, politics, diversity…and everything else. It's Emil Amok's Takeout!

Rss Feed Tweeter button Facebook button Reddit button Linkedin button Youtube button