Category Archives: news

Bundling for Democracy and your Eggs Obama

(The original version of this was on the Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund blog).

That  off-again, on-again morning meeting in San Jose between President Obama and a roundtable of Asian American business leaders represents the stark undemocratic reality of today’s politics.

Not only is it closed to the media, but the participants’ names are part of an exclusive list that haven’t been readily disclosed. Are they embarrassed to be one of 20 or so to pay $40,000 for the privilege of a private audience with the president? Unlikely.

Still, $40,000 for some grub and gab with the president?  If you’re on a Grand Slam breakfast budget, you’re out of luck.  (Of course, at $40k, I’m assuming with the president you get a meal.)

I figured there’s at least one person I could ask who would know the details of this elite “roundtable.” That would have to be Shefali Razdan Duggal, a 40-year-old,  Indian-born, self-employed San Franciscan who has become a big bucks go-to person for Obama in Northern California.

Naturally, she deferred to the official press team of the president.  But Shefali’s definitely high up in the campaign to know what’s going on since she’s  become what is known as a top “bundler.”

Given that the individual limit to federal campaigns is generally $2,500, people who want to get around that low ceiling, like say give $40,000 for some Eggs Obama, just simply funnel the money directly to a person like Shefali.

She becomes the ribbon and bow around the checks that are then delivered to the campaign as “bundled.”  

Compared to a Super PAC, it may seem like a small hole in the system. Nevertheless, it’s still a way to get around limits and funnel large amounts of money legally.

For 2012, Shefali has become one of the top Asian American bundlers  for Obama in the nation. Earlier this year, the Obama campaign disclosed to the Federal Electon Committee that she was responsible for between  $200,000-$500,000 in bundled contributions, with her own personal lifetime contributions at $122,177. (All the numbers come from the campaign finance watchdog, opensecrets.org).

And that’s a moderate amount among the 532 bundlers in 33 states who have raised about $106.4 million for Obama and the DNC this election year.

Among Asian American Obama bundlers is Los Angeles-based Brian Lee, the LegalZoom entrepreneur who has given $299,800 to the Obama campaign.

But it’s the number of Asian Indian bundlers that seems to be more impressive. The list includes among others, the self-help guru, Deepak Chopra ($197,000) and New York’s Deven Parekh of Insight Venture Partners ($226,100).

Asian Indians are actually the No.3  Asian American ethnic group after the Chinese and Filipinos. And yet when it comes to giving money, Indian Americans seem well represented.

I certainly didn’t see many Chinese or Filipino names on Obama’s bundlers list.  Maybe the Chinese are still reeling over the donation scandals during the Clinton years.

Being a bundler is definitely legit and has its advantages. While everyone denies there’s a quid pro quo, in politics, every penny matters—especially if you want something.

In the 2008 campaign, Hillsborough’s John Roos was a big bundler for Obama while at  the law firm Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati. And though his own personal contribution is on the books at a relatively modest $41,600, I’m sure it was mere coincidence that Roos, a Lowell High alum  was ultimately tabbed by Obama to serve as ambassador to Japan.

So my guess is the Asian American leaders at this somewhat secret “Roundtable”  meeting are likely to be made up of primarily Indian American entrepreneurs and businessmen who see nothing wrong with giving $40,000 for a little face time with the president to discuss such things as the flow of highly educated workers through immigration and special visas to work in their businesses. In other words, they’ll talk about all their special issues.

This would ordinarily be seen as a form of  “lobbying,” but since there are few things lower in the likeability scale than “lobbyist,” why impugn these wealthy private Asian American “roundtable-ists”?

Indeed, lobbyists are so disliked, Federal law requires that a campaign disclose only the bundling activity—of lobbyists.

That’s why President Obama and the Democrats, having disclosed all 532 bundlers, are actually much more open and go above and beyond the law on this point than the GOP.

Maybe bundling isn’t so bad, say compared to the current campaign finance villains, the Super-PACs.

Still, while the Obama has been upfront about his bundlers, the GOP has only disclosed that 22 registered lobbyists have bundled a measly $2.9 million.

Romney’s other bundlers?  No one knows how much has been raised by how many. Romney hasn’t disclosed them. Maybe he should. Now.

But this is how our democracy works today. There are lots of dark places where photo-ops give way to cash-ops.

And neither you nor I can have breakfast with the president in a closed-door roundtable.

Actually, I thought it would be nice if President Obama capped off Asian Pacific American Heritage Month with a nice fitting visit into the community to eat some veggie pork buns or something.

He could have visited Asian Health Services in Oakland and witnessed all the language issues they work around to provide health care to those who need it most. Or he could have visited Asian Americans for Community Involvement in San Jose.

But when the president is in campaign mode, there’s little time in democracy for the unbundled.

Justice served in Rutgers sentencing?

I must admit to being a little shocked yesterday when the judge in the Dharun Ravi sentencing gave the 20-year-old former Rutgers student a toungue-lashing, then turned around and tapped him on the wrist.

I advocated leniency, but I never expected a 30-day sentence.

Ravi could have gotten 10 years in prison for his webcam spying of Clementi, who was having sex with another man.

Still, the case is about an invasion of privacy and not the death of Tyler Clementi. When you consider how Ravi has spent nearly 2 years waiting for his ultimate sentence, 30 days and  a 3 year conditional probation period seems more fair than not.

To demand more would be to scapegoat Ravi for all the homophobia in society. Ravi’s privacy breach  alone didn’t drive Clementi to despair. There are other forces at play that contributed to Clementi’s overall mindset.

In the end, the judge was right. He managed to disappoint both sides. And I guess that’s as close as it gets these days to balancing the scales of justice. 

See my orignal blog post at the Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund blog.

Facebook’s IPO may have fizzled, but Zuckerberg M&A a winner

It’s been said that  marriages are the love version of “mergers and acquisitions.”

In that sense, if you’re Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg what could be better  than to have a genuine back up to a not so smashing IPO?

Zuckerberg’s marriage to Priscilla Chan is actually a better story than the flat IPO.

It’s a reminder to the tech elite that the important stuff isn’t what’s under their noses on an HD screen, it’s the stuff that’s happening off-line in real life.

Creating the community on-line only makes sense if there’s something real going on off-line worth sharing.

Zuckerberg shared the news on Saturday.

It also reminds us that beyond the hardware and software and social networking platforms that all these smart people in the Valley  can create, the future of their businesses really depends on what goes on with them as people. You know matters of the heart. Honesty. Integrity. Doing the right thing. All that counts more than we see on a spread sheet. Sure, some greedy bastards still win, but not all the time.

So the real answer to the question as to the future of Facebook will be based on Zuckerberg’s ability to stay true to his personal vision and keep other corporate types from screwing it up.

I don’t know if that will happen, but the marriage news is a nice touch after Friday’s IPO. 

Marrying his Harvard sweetheart after 9 years?

Updating his status on the biggest weekend of his life was his best move ever. 

And on the week of her graduation from UCSF med school,  probably her’s too.

Congratulations to both.

The incredible potential of potential: On Facebook, commercial space travel and the 2012 graduates of SFSU

This week we have arrived at an exciting time when hope, dreams and potential have all come together in a combustible mix.  

We’ve got Facebook’s IPO, commercial space travel’s first big test , and my oldest kid’s college graduation all coming at once.

The excitement is all about the tremendous unknown. Upside? Anything can happen.

Including the downside.

Place your bets.

FACEBOOK

Is it heresy to say I was rooting for Facebook to come undone on the opening? 

There was a pop from $38 to $43 and a few billionaires were still made, but really, do the 1 percent really deserve more? To me, it just seemed more decent to bet against greed.

Better for the soul.

This is not to say I’m anti-Facebook or social networking (though I do favor Twitter). In fact, Facebook is a great American story of entrepreneurship and the drive to create the next big thing.  

When I was in college, I was romanced by the big ideas of the past. Hegel anyone? I wasn’t  tinkering around in the computer lab anticipating the future and the digital translation of everything in life.

I was thinking about  things like the Great American Novel, not the Great Killer App.

Oh, and I actually had the Facebook in my hands. The printed version. I was thinking about that person I met in the Freshman Union.  I was in the G’s.  So was some guy named Gates.

Over the last few days I’ve had several friends ask me about Facebook, and what could I say?  What’s it going to be worth in 5, 10, 20 years? Remember My Space? These tech things trend out.  Remember when Palm and Blackberry were way cool, then way not?

Speculation is a matter of heat and Facebook right now is both hot and not.  If you’re on it constantly, do you click on any ads?  Does the company really  know how it  will make money on advertising through social networking?

I don’t know the answers to Facebook’s future value. No one really does.

But this I know. If you’re a user, Facebook still knows more about you than you know about it.

So until things become a tad more transparent,  and the lucky buy their Ferraris and SF condos, Facebook remains that nice, nosy little utility of life and any big bet on it is all about faith, hope, and a whole lot of greed.

COMMERCIAL SPACE TRAVEL?

On Saturday comes the big rocket test for Space X, the big bet on commercial space flight that could bring the Jetsons to reality.

The Mile High Club?  Compared to Space X, that’s like necking in the backseat of a Mustang. With commercial space flight, we’re talking about reaching heights around 240 miles above the earth. 

Travelling in space may seem cool to the astrophysicists amongst us. But not me. Space? This is why God gave us telescopes—so that we can view the cosmos from our Lazy-Boy.  (Oh, actually, there is an app for that now, isn’t there?)

Still, if you’d like to fly non-stop someday from here to the space station,  I don’t want to be the person to say no.  Personally, I’d rather see a bullet train through the state. Or BART get a station in Livermore.

When you consider the billions of dollars needed just to see if commercial space travel is feasible during these very tenuous financial times, I’m wondering if the coolness factor of saying you can do it is enough reason to actually do it?

So I doubt if I’ll  be a Frequent Flyer.

I’m plenty happy  just  getting to Cincinnati every now and then to see my in-laws.  Given that’s like going back in time, who needs commercial space travel?

MY DAUGHTER’S SFSU COMMENCEMENT

Lastly, is there anything more hopeful than a graduation?

I’ll be on the field at San Francisco State’s Cox Stadium when my daughter Jilly crosses the stage with a B.S. in Geology.

This is a big deal for a family of liberal arts-types, who last considered science when people still used slide rules. (Youngsters, those really were considered accurate, to the nearest black line).

As a young girl, my daughter seemed destined to follow in her parents’ tradition.  In high school, she took chemistry for jocks (which was a little more than an analysis of Gatorade, but not by much). I knew she could do better, but I didn’t push her. I lectured. She didn’t listen. I made it her responsibility.

Still, here was a girl, and a person of color, who it was assumed, had no talent for the sciences. In today’s tech oriented world, that’s like saying you have no ticket to the future.

But boy, did she prove them all wrong. And all it took was some great professors at SFSU to help her discover that.

So while I’m proud of my daughter, I’m also a little worried about the future of our state’s high ed programs.  

SFSU may have a rockier road  ahead than my daughter.

The one thing about the state schools is they were always  there to assure a level of education for all.

Now with all the cutbacks in the state’s budget, I’m not so sure. 

For state schools, it’s all about resources, and currently there aren’t many. Even my daughter felt the pinch. She needed an extra year to graduate because she couldn’t get into required classes that were either cancelled, full, or not available.

I’m a big supporter of affirmative action. But that’s not the only answer to real educational equality.  You can bicker about college admissions all you want, but it still comes down to resources.

 What, after all, are you vying for admission to?  When budgets are cut, as my daughter found out searching for a basic chemistry course, sometimes it means there’s  “no there there.”

Graduation will be my celebration that there was a there for my daughter at 19th and Holloway.

I have no hesitation, nor doubts here.  My abundant hope is our state system will also be there for the vast numbers of Californians  in the future.