Archive for category everything else
I just started up on Facebook again.
Maybe it was because I just went to a journalism conference and there was more interest it seemed in the digital media than there was in any other form of media. Should I trust it, most of the people at the conference don’t even know what a typewriter was. But it’s a fact. FB is the internet, the better AOL, the place where people are. So I am now on Facebook:
I’m on “Emil Guillermo Media” https://www.facebook.com/emilguillermo.media Like me there.
And so as not to confuse my professional writing from my personal musings and pictures of food and stuff Asian Americans like me like to post:
You will note that I was an early adopter of FB, starting up when they opened to the general public in 2007. But I’m slow. I didn’t become addicted until last week.
That’s all as a preface to this note I posted on FB last week and that I repost here on my personal website. You see, I had an unintentional “life event” on FB, and I got to see how FB works so powerfully to connect people at the drop of the hat.
But as the Wall Street Journal would say, it required some “Clarification and Amplifcation.”
Here’s my note:
Dear Friends. I won’t bury the lead. I didn’t get married today. But hear me out, it’s kind of an interesting story. This is the first time I’ve been able to get to the computer to make amends for my errant post this a.m. As many of you know, I have “stayed away” from Facebook for many years. I was a bad FB’er. Maybe it was because I remember the original hardbound Facebook, where I would try to figure out how to meet some cute freshman from Radcliffe. But recently, I’ve been convinced that I should get on this thing (Zuckerberg will have Asian American babies and they will need help fighting any glass ceilings they might face). It’s also better than “aol” and where else can I go on the internet? www.amok.com? So I have become a “user.” But still a neophyte. As I adjusted my status from “nothing” to “married,” I was in the wrong update area. And so instead of simply saying “I’m married,” it posted I had a life event and “got married.” This, of course, was news to my wife of 26 years as well. So this is turning into a life event all the same. I am hearing from many people who wish me well. I am grateful for that and I’m sorry to alarm you, though it is a bit like a happier, cyber version of Huck and Tom attending their own funeral. My wife Kathy and I actually eloped and many years ago (26 years this month) and never had a big party, so this is a reminder that when we do get around to that big party, you all can show up on FB and real life. We weren’t registered anywhere for this, so no harm there. I’m just gratified to see so many well wishers and hope this explanation helps straighten things out. And please rest assured, I did not do this to get another column topic. Though, I will add this to my file of “Adventures in learning FB.” This is my personal site where you will get stuff like this.Go to the Emil Guillermo Media fb site to get my other writing. Best to you all, Emil P.S. and next time I get married, you definitely will be the first to know.
Matt Cain was great, but my dad and I had our own perfect SF Giants game just before Father’s Day, 1978
I had tickets for Wednesday night, but my cousin and nephew used them. Just my luck to miss history.
I was always planning to go today, Thursday, June 14th. It’s a day game and matched the circumstances of a game I attended with my dad in 1978.
That day was far from perfect.
But the baseball, and all that baseball can do for a father and son was perfect.
On top of that, the Giants won. What more could I ask for?
And then life ended. No need for extra innings.
News that boxing promoter Bob Arum is calling for an investigation on the Paquiao-Bradley split decision, and refusing to grant a rematch until the Nevada Attorney General’s office makes an inquiry, should come as no surprise.
You’d be calling for an investigation too if you had a record of bribery and suspected corruption like Arum that goes back to 1995.
Arum’s record, of course, is old news. But the shocking results of the Pacquiao-Bradley fight, where such an obvious winner is declared a loser, makes the past suddenly relevant again, if only to let everyone realize who we are dealing with and the kind of “sport” professional boxing has become.
A call for an investigation merely takes a little heat off Arum and lets the world know he appears to be just as outraged over the controversial split decision as any sane unbiased observer of the fight. .
Never mind that Arum’s still likely to make millions no matter what happens in the aftermath. As the promoter of both Pacquiao and Bradley, he’s no different from a bookie or a hedge fund manager, who balances his books and profits either way. He can’t lose.
Conflict of interest is just part of the professional game. Boxing promotion is as close to a monopoly as it gets. And if it wasn’t, what do you get? Don King? If the state of boxing didn’t bother us before the weekend, maybe it shouldn’t bother us now.
That only works if you can separate the seamy business side of boxing from the actual sport, the fight between two opponents going at each other.
Some of us really are interested not in the betting and the money side, but in the “sweet science,” the sport of boxing. And that’s where some of us finally realized this weekend it really can’t be done.
We saw the fight. So did the judges, who scored it 115-113.
Judge Jerry Roth called it for Pacquiao.
Duane Ford and C.J. Ross called it for Bradley.
I’ve watched fights and studied boxing. I know a jab from a hook. Incompetence in athletic judging is nothing new. I’ve mentioned the French Olympic skating judges. It comes up even in legitimate sports. In the PacBradley fight, three of the judges were over 70. No age discrimination from me. But this is where subjectivity appears, and where generational differences come into play as to boxing judging standards. New computer stats that show actual punches thrown and landed are supposed to smooth out the subjectivity and take away the guess work. By those numbers, Pacquiao landed at least 100 more punches than Bradley. Pacquiao’s display in the fourth and fifth rounds were enough to give him the decision. Bradley never came close to performing at that level.
Those who bring up Pacquaio’s victorious fights with Juan Manuel Marquez and say Marquez should have won them are comparing apples to oranges. Those were actual close fights and really could have gone either way. No complaint from me. Those were razor close.
The Pacquiao Bradley fight was not 115-113 close. Not in Bradley’s favor.
Before the fight, there was some talk about why these three judges in particular were called in for this fight. Just their luck? Commentators were surprised that more experienced judges weren’t called in.
Still, any calls for some kind of investigation on the judges and the judging process seem all for show at this point.
I don’t expect anything to happen to change a thing. In a few weeks, all this will be conveniently forgotten and more pay-per-view matches will be scheduled.
Just not with my hard-earned money.
Will they take yours?
See also previous posts on SFgate.com and on the Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund blog.
In this video, which one of these innocent bystanders would you be? If you saw a situation like this, how would you act?
Would you be at the front lifting the car? In the back rooting on?
Or would you have given up and walked away, not wanting to get involved in an impossible situation that clearly isn’t your business anyway. Can you deadlift a burning BMW by yourself? Is that a good reason not to get involved?
What if we all pitch in?
It’s a little of that 9/11 spirit in action just a few days after.